<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge and Burn &#8211; Photoshop tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digidiversity.co.uk/2009/09/dodge-and-burn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digidiversity.co.uk/2009/09/dodge-and-burn/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography • Digital Editing • Digital Art • Digital Diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brudney</title>
		<link>http://www.digidiversity.co.uk/2009/09/dodge-and-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brudney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamwignall.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Nice tutorial.  Thank you.  Was looking for one on curves but dodging and burning skills are also good to have.  It won&#039;t matter at all to some and might be a stumbling block for others, but your writing needs some work.  For example, the words that are short for &quot;it is&quot; (it&#039;s) and &quot;do not&quot; (don&#039;t) and &quot;you are&quot; (you&#039;re) are contractions and need the apostrophes.  And there&#039;s other stuff.  You might ask a friend who is a good writer to edit your writing.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tutorial.  Thank you.  Was looking for one on curves but dodging and burning skills are also good to have.  It won&#8217;t matter at all to some and might be a stumbling block for others, but your writing needs some work.  For example, the words that are short for &#8220;it is&#8221; (it&#8217;s) and &#8220;do not&#8221; (don&#8217;t) and &#8220;you are&#8221; (you&#8217;re) are contractions and need the apostrophes.  And there&#8217;s other stuff.  You might ask a friend who is a good writer to edit your writing.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adwig</title>
		<link>http://www.digidiversity.co.uk/2009/09/dodge-and-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>adwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamwignall.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-59</guid>
		<description>yes, but using a strength of 10% you can go over a few times and build up the effect slowly. Also different areas will want different strengths applied to them. Its more accurate and you can always still adjust the opacity afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, but using a strength of 10% you can go over a few times and build up the effect slowly. Also different areas will want different strengths applied to them. Its more accurate and you can always still adjust the opacity afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenni0206</title>
		<link>http://www.digidiversity.co.uk/2009/09/dodge-and-burn/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>jenni0206</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamwignall.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Also remember that you can modulate the strength of the effect by changing the opacity of the layer itself. I often burn-in at a stronger strength (say, 50%) then adjust the slider on the layer until I find just the right mix. For me, this is a more convenient way of seeing the effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also remember that you can modulate the strength of the effect by changing the opacity of the layer itself. I often burn-in at a stronger strength (say, 50%) then adjust the slider on the layer until I find just the right mix. For me, this is a more convenient way of seeing the effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
